Torrent The Office Season 1 Uk

Sites: 555.Trackers: 235,759.Active Torrents: 13,719,378.Files: 285.36M.Size: 17,362.00 TB.Peers: 43.30MBrowse Torrents.10 years of isoHunt, past and futurePosted byon Jan. 2210 years of isoHunt.

22 to the day, when the domain was registered. When I started isoHuntduring engineering school, I truly did not think I'd be working on it for 10 years, but here Iam.

Napster, Kazaa, Suprnova, LokiTorrent. Big names have come and gone, and the Internet haschanged. One would think we the people of the Internet are losing to the copyright cartels, butI think different. I saw solidarity against tyranny in protests against SOPA, which did not pass(happy coincident that Internet Freedom Day, Jan.

18 when SOPA failed, is so close to ouranniversary). I see musicians and filmmakers slowly but surely warming up to new possibilitiesof Internet distribution and promotion, abandoning notions of '1 download = 1 lost sale' in thephysical age.

Ideals of the Free Software movement and Creative Commons will face new challengeswith 3D printed copies of physical objects, replicated from copyrightable digital designs. Weare moving into the world of science fiction. Will copyright or even money be relics like inStar Trek, where all material scarcity and wants are gone, replicators can make anything needed,and holodecks can create any world imaginable? Too utopian perhaps, but if someone from 100years ago is to look at technologies we have now, a lot of it maybe construed as magic too.Without being strictly sentimental with the past or the future, there's a point I'm trying tomake.

I did not think I'd be working on isoHunt for 10 years, but I have. I'm imagining what thenext 10 years should bring. Why am I still working on isoHunt? To quotesubverting the establishment?

No, we are in the culture business. Culture, distilled intodigital files, shared by people, on the Internet.

In the culture business, there are creators,and there are consumers. In this age of 'broadcasting yourself', we are often both creators aswell as consumers. And in my ideal world, consumers will share what they want, freely, andcreators will be promoted accordingly and compensated fairly. Minimal friction, and minimalmiddlemen in the way who doesn't help in connecting consumers directly with creators.I've fought Hollywood's lawsuit for almost 7 years now, it's so ancient it's almost not evenworth mentioning. Same goes with CRIA's lawsuit. I'm tired of this squabble and they trying tomake me and isoHunt another scapegoat in their crusade of no historic meaning.

The only way tomove forward is together, with the creators. For the next 10 years, I'm imagining a reboot ofisoHunt. From a mostly passive search engine, to a new system where you the consumer can beactive participants in bringing creators on board, and you can frictionlessly contribute to thecreators. I'm calling this isoHunt Spotlight for now, until we think of a better name. And thiswill be a new endeavour, a complement to isoHunt the search engine which will continue itsmission of indexing any and all torrent links. What is Spotlight exactly?

Think Kickstarter,Netflix, Spotify, Gamefly, Kindle Owners' Lending Library rolled into one, with global licensingfrom day one that only makes sense for the Internet. We are still in the planning stages of thisthing, so we can use your thought and help in making this happen. If we can make such a systemof frictionless funding, creating, consuming and sharing happen like I'm imagining, it's goingto be beautiful. To get there, we’ll need to bring a lot more creators on board, together.Oh, and we just passed half a million fans on our Facebook page.

Along with the millions ofusers who have frequented isoHunt the last 10 years, thanks for your support! Cheers to the next10.Google: Censorship and Antitrust bully.

We need a protest.Posted by on Aug. 10that Googlethey will downrank sites 'with too many valid DMCA takedown notices'. Since isoHunt isof most noticed sites, that is likely to happen to to us.But let's get it out of the way that we are crying foul just because we are scared of losingtraffic. About 75% of all our traffic are direct traffic, with 21% coming from Google searches(and much of that being searches on 'isohunt' and 'isohunt.com'). So even if Google takesisoHunt entirely out of their index, we'll survive. Unless Google start censoring isoHunt at theChrome browser level, but let's not give them any ideas.What I want to bring to attention about this search algorithm change is Google is no longer thesearch engine upstart they used to be (for a while now). As Search Engine Land says, Google isWhat's missing on Google'sYoutube.

The Office Season 1 Episodes

The by far largest video content website in the world ought to have very high volume ofDMCA notices, if not the most, and it's inconspicuously missing from the list. To downrank andcensor any website that's not Google's that receives a high number of DMCA notices? Soundsexactly like antitrust to me.Now, on what is 'valid'DMCA notices to warrant Google labeling a site as pirate? Google Legal hasbefore, to prop themselves up as 'legit'. That is their opinion.

What is really wrong withdownranking/censoring websites based on 'valid' DMCA notices however is that what's valid issimply notices that has not been countered. With millions of links subject to notices, we neverbothered countering any DMCA notices on Google (not to mention Google only recently put up theirtransparency report so there hasn't even been an easy way to review what's been noticed perdomain). That does not mean all links under isohunt.com which Google has filtered by notices arevalid, just because we haven't countered them. Not any more valid than how Youtube took downjust because a broadcaster said so. Is what Google/Youtube routinely call valid takedowns valid,likebefore? (although to Google's credit, a video of ais too good to takedown, unlike a video from Mars)To complicate matters, we are also a search engine, like Google, not just a regular website. Wehave ourand takedown process, like Google.

(ours was electronic by email years ago I might add, whenGoogle was still requiring snail mail) And contrary to popular beliefs, we have plenty oftorrent links toand we'll be addingfrom thesoon. Is it right for Google to downrank or outright censor torrent links to legit,non-infringing content on isoHunt.com (or any other site), just because copyright holders havespammed a million 'valid' DMCA notices on our other pages to Google that hasn't been countered?Censorship will never be easier, by DMCA spam.The media conglomerates failed to pass SOPA, now they are getting in bed with Youtube at thepublic's expense. I'd point you to Google alternatives like(which respects youra lot more to boot), or heck,but since everyone google, that's unlikely to go far in practice. While Google already starteddown this path of censorship withbefore, search ranking based on mere DMCA notices is a line that should not be crossed.We need a protest against Google censorship and antitrust.With constitutional freedoms at stake, isoHunt files pleadPosted by on Mar. 3Freedom of expression on the Internet is under attack. From SOPA in the US, ACTAinternationally, and C-11 in Canada, the same theme is apparent on the agenda of copyrightindustry groups: instead of dealing with actual copyright violators, they want to shut downtechnologies and internet services that they say will be used by violators.

It’s the samealarmist approach that goes back to the VCR and the radio. As the Internet emerges as thede-facto medium of communication, sharing and expression, the control over distribution bycopyright industries is threatened. In turn, the constitutional freedom of expression ofCanadians and all participants on the Internet is threatened.Since SOPA, a new term has been coined on this age: the War on Piracy.

What it really is is aWar on the Internet. In our latest response to CRIA filed in Court, we ask the Supreme Court ofBC to adjudicate this crucial issue of balance between the constitutional rights of people onthe Internet to communicate, share and search, versus the rights of copyright industries tolimit such rights in the corporate interest of protecting and extending copyright.

IsoHunt urgesthe court to examine this issue carefully, for the sake of innovations on the Internet, freeexchange of culture, and fundamental constitutional freedoms.filed at the Supreme Court of BC, Canada. The Attorney General has been put on notice ofconstitutional issues raised.News:-(May 5, 2012) with.